Compare tools side by side

Pick two or three tools to see their ratings and the supplier’s answers next to each other. Useful when you’re deciding which one your school should use.

You can type a name or a website, such as claude.ai.

DebateOwl

Scroll sideways to see every column.

FieldDebateOwl
Staff rating Amber
Doesn’t say if it is a processor or controller
Pupil rating Amber
Doesn’t say if it is a processor or controller
Main useStudy tools and flashcards
SupplierThe company that makes and runs the tool.Ádám Gáborjáni, Hungary, publishing as Pi-Stack (pi-stack.org); contact hello@debateowl.com, privacy@debateowl.com
CategoryWhat sort of tool it is, for example a chatbot or a lesson-planning helper.Debate prep / study tool
Pupil-facingWhether pupils use it directly, or only staff. Pupil use needs extra care.student-facing (aimed at students and competitive debaters, with features for coaches and judges); designed for users 13 and older
Processor or controllerA processor only uses data on your school’s instructions. A controller makes its own decisions about the data, which means your school has less say.not stated
Where data is storedWhich country the data is stored in. UK or EU storage is usually simpler for schools.not stated (stored on Supabase infrastructure; inputs sent to OpenRouter for AI processing, ElevenLabs for voice, Exa for web research, PostHog, Sentry and Jam for analytics, errors and bug reports; regions not stated)
Trains AI models on inputsWhether what you type (or upload) may be used to improve the supplier’s AI. “No” is what you want for anything about pupils or staff.No (privacy policy: "We do not use your content to train AI models")
How long inputs are keptHow long the supplier keeps what you type before deleting it.not stated (users can download their data, erase saved work or delete the account in Settings; Jam keeps bug-report recordings until no longer needed, no fixed period)
Data processing agreement (DPA)The data processing agreement: the contract that sets out how the supplier must look after your school’s data.not stated
Signs individual DPAs with schoolsWhether the supplier will sign a data agreement with your school specifically, rather than just standard online terms.not stated
UK GDPR representative / DPOWhether the supplier names a data protection officer or UK representative you can contact about data questions.not stated (privacy contact privacy@debateowl.com; general contact hello@debateowl.com)
Minimum ageThe youngest age the supplier allows to use the tool. Check this before any pupil uses it.13+ (designed for users 13 and older)
Key safety noteAnything else worth knowing, such as admin controls or content filtering.individual paid app: 3-day free trial then $5/month + tax, no permanent free plan; sign-in with Google or email; inputs go to third-party AI models via OpenRouter; in voice rounds Chrome sends speech audio to Google; Jam bug-report scripts load for every visitor and capture page details, clicks and key presses; terms say disputes go to binding arbitration and name no governing law; no school offer, DPA or certification found
Research statusHow complete our research on this tool is.partial (privacy policy updated 23 Oct 2026 and terms updated 1 May 2026, read 27 Oct 2026; no supplier name, DPA or data location published)
Last checked2026-11-03

Ratings are a rules-based summary of each supplier’s published terms. Not legal advice. How we rate tools

Compare AI tools side by side | AI Prefect