Compare tools side by side
Pick two or three tools to see their ratings and the supplier’s answers next to each other. Useful when you’re deciding which one your school should use.
Scroll sideways to see every column.
| Field | PureHumanize.ai |
|---|---|
| Staff rating | Amber Training depends on plan or settings |
| Pupil rating | Amber Training depends on plan or settings |
| Main use | Writing and paraphrasing assistant |
| SupplierThe company that makes and runs the tool. | not stated (no company name published; site signs itself PureHumanize.ai, contact support@purehumanize.ai) |
| CategoryWhat sort of tool it is, for example a chatbot or a lesson-planning helper. | AI humanizer / rewriting (rewrites AI-generated text from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and others to read as human-written; General, Academic, Blog, Formal and other modes) |
| Pupil-facingWhether pupils use it directly, or only staff. Pupil use needs extra care. | not stated (individual accounts; FAQ says students may use it as an editing aid; no school or pupil accounts described) |
| Processor or controllerA processor only uses data on your school’s instructions. A controller makes its own decisions about the data, which means your school has less say. | not stated (privacy policy written as the service deciding how data is used; no school processor terms) |
| Where data is storedWhich country the data is stored in. UK or EU storage is usually simpler for schools. | not stated (data may be transferred outside your country; privacy policy says standard contractual clauses (SCCs) are applied for UK and EU users; storage location and AI providers not named); Firebase, Mixpanel and Google Analytics analytics |
| Trains AI models on inputsWhether what you type (or upload) may be used to improve the supplier’s AI. “No” is what you want for anything about pupils or staff. | unclear - homepage and FAQ say drafts are 'not used to train public models', but the privacy policy lists improving AI performance as a purpose and does not say whether your text trains its own private rewriting models |
| How long inputs are keptHow long the supplier keeps what you type before deleting it. | uploaded text deleted after processing unless you keep it in your account (history); backups and logs deleted within 90 days; account deletion on request |
| Data processing agreement (DPA)The data processing agreement: the contract that sets out how the supplier must look after your school’s data. | not stated |
| Signs individual DPAs with schoolsWhether the supplier will sign a data agreement with your school specifically, rather than just standard online terms. | not stated |
| UK GDPR representative / DPOWhether the supplier names a data protection officer or UK representative you can contact about data questions. | not stated (privacy contact 'PureHumanize.ai – Privacy Office', support@purehumanize.ai; no DPO or UK representative named) |
| Minimum ageThe youngest age the supplier allows to use the tool. Check this before any pupil uses it. | 13+ (not intended for under-13s) |
| Key safety noteAnything else worth knowing, such as admin controls or content filtering. | built to make AI-written text pass as human: pricing says all plans include 'AI detection bypass technology' and claim to be undetectable by Turnitin, GPTZero, ZeroGPT and Originality.ai, and it offers an Academic mode and an 'AI Essay Humanizer', so pupil or student use for coursework is a real academic-integrity and malpractice risk (its own FAQ says not to use it to misrepresent authorship); no named company behind the site; storage location and AI providers not named; Firebase, Mixpanel and Google Analytics on the site; 250 words free, then paid plans in USD; same site template and policy family as Whisper AI Transcribe |
| Research statusHow complete our research on this tool is. | sourced (privacy and terms undated, read 9 Nov 2026) |
| Last checked | 2026-11-09 |
Ratings are a rules-based summary of each supplier’s published terms. Not legal advice. How we rate tools