Data protection impact assessment (DPIA): draft
Tool: Running Paper Supplier: Running Paper Limited (UK, company 14874659; ICO ZB706592)
School: [School to complete: school name] Prepared by: [School to complete: name and role] Date: [School to complete: date]
Draft generated by AI Prefect from the supplier’s published documents (checked 2026-11-01). A starting point only; not legal advice. Verify every fact before relying on it.
1. What the tool will be used for
| Type of tool | AI marking of handwritten work |
|---|---|
| Purpose in our school | [School to complete: what you will use it for, which year groups or staff, and why] |
| Who will use it | Supplier says pupil-facing: teacher-facing; pupils sit printed papers by hand; teachers send reviewed feedback to pupils or parents [School to complete: number and roles of users] |
| Personal data involved | [School to complete: e.g. staff names and emails; any pupil data; any special category data (health, SEND, safeguarding)? Avoid where possible] |
2. How the supplier handles data
| Processor or controller | processor (school, college or trust is controller; privacy policy and FAQ) |
|---|---|
| Where data is stored | core infrastructure and stored student work in the United Kingdom; some processing in the EEA under UK adequacy regulations; limited marking data processed in the US by AI providers under the UK-US Data Bridge or EU SCCs with the UK Addendum (FAQ) |
| Trains AI on inputs | no - "We don't train any large language models on student data" (FAQ) |
| How long inputs are kept | not stated publicly - set by the school's DPA (available on request) |
| Data processing agreement | Not stated by the supplier. [School to complete: DPA reference or date signed] Signs individual DPAs: yes - Data Processing Agreement forms part of each customer agreement; DPA, sub-processor list and security policy available on request before signing |
| Supplier DPO / UK representative | not stated (contact info@runningpaper.co.uk) |
| Minimum age | Not stated by the supplier. [School to complete: minimum age] |
| Other safety notes | teacher reviews every mark before release; Cyber Essentials; not linked to any exam board, so not for real GCSE/A level grades |
| Lawful basis | [School to complete: e.g. public task (Article 6(1)(e)) or legitimate interests; Article 9 condition if special category data] |
3. Risks and how we will reduce them
AI Prefect rating: staff Green, pupils Amber.
| Risk | Suggested measure | Likelihood / severity | Residual risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data may be stored outside the UK/EU (Mixed) | Confirm the transfer safeguards (UK IDTA, standard contractual clauses or adequacy). | [School to complete: low / medium / high] | [School to complete: accepted?] |
| No data processing agreement published | Request a DPA before use, or limit use to non-personal data. | [School to complete: low / medium / high] | [School to complete: accepted?] |
| Minimum age: not stated | Check this against the age of any pupils who will use it. | [School to complete: low / medium / high] | [School to complete: accepted?] |
| AI output may be inaccurate or biased | Staff review all output before it is used; do not rely on it for decisions about individuals. | [School to complete: low / medium / high] | [School to complete: accepted?] |
| [School to complete: any other risks] | [School to complete: measure] |
4. Sign-off
| DPO advice | [School to complete: DPO comments and date] |
|---|---|
| Decision | [School to complete: approved / approved with conditions / not approved] |
| Approved by | [School to complete: name, role, date] |
| Review date | [School to complete: usually within 12 months, or when the supplier changes its terms] |
Sources
- https://www.runningpaper.co.uk/faq
- https://www.runningpaper.co.uk/privacy
- https://www.runningpaper.co.uk/terms